Share this content on Facebook!
09 May 2016

Immigration lawyer Asheville

After i checked my inbox today I found a very important email from an organization of immigration professionals that we belong to.

Actually, this email is indeed crucial to my ability to practice immigration law that I forwarded it to all of my staff, saved it inside our firm's electronic address book, and printed it for inclusion within the binder that sits on my small desk right by my telephone.

Yet, the fact is that this email makes me seem like I'm a silent partner inside a bit of a deception being perpetrated on the public by CIC. Allow me to explain.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada clearly takes great public pride in the quantity of information and resources it provides for the public through its website and call centre. CIC boasts that "All the forms and data that you need to make application for a visa are around for free on this web site."

Therefore, it is no wonder that within the website's FAQ, the answer to the question: "Do I would like an immigration representative that helped me to apply?" is really a "no."

People is told that "The Government of Canada treats everyone equally, whether or not they make use of a representative or not."

Will your case be processed faster in the event you work with a representative? CIC advises that "If you choose to hire a representative, your application will not be given special attention through the immigration officer."

Is that this really true? Is the information you need really available? Do you need a lawyer? Would it not make any difference when you have one? Put another way: are people who are using lawyers and consultants to take care of their immigration applications just throwing away their cash?

I hate answering these questions since doing other's immigration tasks are the way i make my living. People will be justified in being sceptical about my strategies to these questions.

But you "all the knowledge you need" isn't on the market and, yes, most of the time a lawyer or consultant's involvement can spell the main difference between success, delay, or abject failure.

The knowledge at is general naturally and should not possibly contemplate the infinite factual scenarios that applicants might present when applying. Furthermore, the agents on the call centre cannot and don't provide callers with legal counsel. It's simply not inside their mandate to do so. Instead, they offer "general information on the CIC lines of commercial... provide case specific information, and accept orders for CIC publications and application kits."

Quite simply, they cannot tell you that which you 'should' do when confronted with obstacles or strategic decisions to make.

Also, should you encounter an issue which needs to be escalated, which isn't uncommon, you'll find precious little info on the CIC website regarding where you can direct your trouble or question.

Not with immigration professionals.

The email I received today is definitely an update of CIC's protocol on how immigration professionals should direct their queries. The correspondence contains the current email address for every Canadian visa post overseas and the names and emails from the immigration program managers each and every of the offices. It informs us how, and also to whom, to direct case-specific enquiries towards the Case Management Branch in Ottawa when and the way to follow up when we don't get a timely reply. It offers instructions regarding how to direct communications associated with service quality complaints, situations involving possible misconduct or malfeasance of immigration officers, procedures, operational and selection policy, and processing times and levels.

To my knowledge, these details are not given to the public. CIC's failure to publicise this information does not reflect preferential treatment for those who find themselves represented. Instead, it's simply an acknowledgement that immigration professionals do, and have always, played an important role to make an overburdened and under-resourced program function at all (or even work well).

Sharing this information with the public would result in an avalanche of correspondence being provided to senior officials who're spread so thinly they could never have any other work done.

It is true that, with the exception of exceptional and deserving cases, getting a lawyer or consultant can't get an application moved in the back with the line for the front of the line. Also, an official is not going to approve a candidate who is not qualified simply because they're represented. However, it's also factual that an honest and experienced representative won't clog up the machine by submitting a software that merely won't fly.

Furthermore, professionals who focus on the bradenton area be aware of process and understand how to avoid errors that create delays. They are fully aware how you can dig through mounds of convoluted facts and effectively and convincingly document and provides the salient ones in order to establish the cornerstone for that approval with the application efficiently and quickly.

CIC doesn't want to acknowledge the positive role lawyers and consultants play for making its bureaucracy work for the public. It really is loath to determine us as partners in delivering the immigration plan it really is given annually by Canada's immigration minister of the day.

Immigration law Asheville


There isn't any comment in this page yet!

Do you want to be the first commenter?

New Comment

Full Name:
E-Mail Address:
Your website (if exists):
Your Comment:
Security code: